Awww Jay wrote a post about us!

A male-run feminist sort of I don’t know what blog mocked several of my articles and sent a gaggle of rambling, incoherent “mainline” nobodies into my comments sections, who still rely on their electronic command and control propaganda boxes in their living rooms, to do what TeeBee tells them.

The idiots on the blog who mocked the articles here were particularly amused at Oswald Spengler, one of the foremost prophetic historians of our era: This was priceless. Not only is Spengler out of the reach of the average blogger, but is out of the reach of 95.6% of Amerikuns. Relentless in their ressentement of anything beautiful, aesthetic and high cultured, the cretins of du innerwebz mak dat good azz shit on dat sihgt call ‘manboobz.’

zhinxy wrote:There's really so much hilarity here it's hard to pick stuff out, but seriously...

Wait, I don't remember any Spengler, what did any of that have to do with Spengler?

ETA: I'm not exactly a huge fan of Spengler, but seriously, I don't remember any Spengler in there?

The idiots on the blog who mocked the articles here were particularly amused at Oswald Spengler, one of the foremost prophetic historians of our era: This was priceless. Not only is Spengler out of the reach of the average blogger, but is out of the reach of 95.6% of Amerikuns.

Relentless in their ressentement of anything beautiful, aesthetic and high cultured, the cretins of du innerwebz mak dat good azz shit on dat sihgt call ‘manboobz.

"The point of this article was to refute the slander from that blog that I am a “kook.”

I don't know, you said some pretty stupid things back there. And ManBoobz does exist to mock sexism and antifeminism in general.

"As a side note, one great proof of the absurdity of feminism is demonstrated here in this very conversation. You aren’t able to interact with a single objective, factual claim I make in this article, and can only engage in name-calling and fallacies."

The notion that feminists are ideologues who can't engage in rational debate and deal with objective facts is hogwash and a very mainstream assuption at that. I guess works like "The Second Sex", "The Meminine Mystique", "A Vindication for the Rights of Women", "Declaration for the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen" was just emotional diatribe and had to reasoning behind it at all. I guess that also means speaches and essays written by Robert Ingersol, Frederick Douglas Harriet Tubman, Susan B. Anthony, Helen Keller, Emma Goldman, Andrea Dworkin etc. had no reasoning and objectivity behind them either.

This silly notion stems from your rediculuous assumtions that women are emotional and can't ever be objective or deal with facts or reason.

Secondly, I didn't just call you names, I adressed your silly claims about feminist internet users being mindless drones and the notions that those users were cretins who were resentful of the greatness of civilization. And just now, I adressed some of your other claims with reason. I'm not here to debate your conspiracy theories in general. I'm here to debate your claims about manboobz users.

Also, your previous article highlighted on manboobz was pretty rediculuous overall. You make the usual idiotic claims from sexist assholes that modern women are just spoiled promiscuous princesses who are trying to be "manwomen". I hate to say this to you, but the realm for women isn't restricted to the home and in being docile, pleasing, submissive, and sweet. it really isn't. Why is everything outside this very narrow field a manly field? Why do so many things like science and math and art and politics have to be manly so that every woman who goes beyond the home has to be some kind of monster and traitor to her sex?

She isn't! Such reactionary black and white notions of the sexes are fallacious and morally repugnant.

"But alas, your feminine emotions have gotten the best of you." (He is assuming I am a woman.)

Vivian is a unisex name. But I won't tell you whether I am male or female, so you can't make generilizations about me. The notion that women can't deal with logic and are overemotional really is a cultural lie that is perpetuated constantly, and I'm frankly sick of it.

Like I said before, this archiac understanding of the sexes where man and masculinity is able, rational, orderly, and rigurous, and womne and femininity are emotional and cause decadence is complete horseshit.

Rutee wrote:For being so smart, he doesn't really consider the possibility that anyone speaking english might not be American, does he?

Not only is Spengler out of the reach of the average blogger, but is out of the reach of 95.6% of Amerikuns.

Vivian is a unisex name.