David K. Meller's History of the Modern World

Aaaaaaand, Meller has proven himself to be a complete prick.

Not that there was any doubt.

Meller’s “harem” of “Little Lady Lovelies” o_O

Thank you for the lead regarding Marie Osmond and her collectors edition of Little Lady Lovelies. My current collection of LLLs is quite adaquate, sooner or later a place will open up in my “harem”, and one or two shall be welcomed.

I forgot about them, until you reminded me, zhinxi, about Marie Osmond’s collection. No, she would not be useful in Houses of Entertainment, and she would be useful in her career as an indepedent Songstress, and as a collectable doll creator.

Most of them seem to be too young to be useful to me, but there are a few who would be welcome!

Maybe her LDS upbringing rendered her more-or-less immune to the dreadful feminuttery and its attendent gender-equality psychosis polluting our society when she was growing up, and this is pleasingly reflected in her dolls!

As far as Houses of Entertainment for oversexed or sexually wayward girls, if there are better alternatives for them, I am happy, as always, to stand corrected.There is nothing about women where I wish any harm or hardship to them, and as I said before, “you can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar”. If people want a world of female “scientists” or ‘test pilots”, Lord Help us All, but as I always say, stranger things have happened! This won’t stop the dedicated Mellerphobes here, but it does show that I can change my mind when confronted with contrary evidence.

Thanx for the leads for Little Lady Lovelies!

History

The following advances would have taken place far ahead of schedule if it weren't for feminists:

color HDTV in 1928, a working transistor by 1935, PEACEFUL nuclear power by 1939, manned space travel by 1948, and on a commercial basis a decade or so after, maglev transcontinental rail service (both freight and passanger) by 1955, SST by 1960, commercially viable electric vehicles by 1975, and the internet/cellphones–with the supporting hardware–by c.1982

Obvious troll is obvious? I don't think he's for real at all, just trolling certain spheres elaborately.

We know he's a troll, that's why we're making fun of him.

Baron_Blackheart wrote:We know he's a troll, that's why we're making fun of him.

If you guys know he's not for real, why bother? There's enough people out there who think this way and believe themselves. :,)
I thought the first post was epic, btw. e-mailing this to some friends right away.

It's MRA troll version of Poe's Law. There is no genuine for lulz troll that someone will not mistake for a real MRA troll, and vice versa.

I just figure it's a matter of commitment. I can see someone swinging by and getting us riled up for lulz, if "when I say inflammatory things, people get inflamed!" is your idea of lulz.

What I can't see is someone doing it for hours at a time, over and over, for a period of months. That's way too much dedication for lulz. That's serious... whatever it is, it's serious.

@MP: Manboobzers use the word "troll" a bit differently than the rest of the internet. Specifically it doesn't carry any connotations of "not serious" here.

MsProgessive: If meller isn't serious, he's put a lot of work doing it, for years, and in lots of places, never breaking character once.

Which means he is real, even if he's faking it.

I came across the perfect anthem for Mr. Meller
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxAUHunJROg&feature=player_embedded#!

We have documented the mental breakdown of David K. Meller into sockpuppeting as Roger T. Cramwell — seemingly precipitated by his ranking only in second place for Troll of the Year 2011 — by citing elsewhere the epic smackdown administered by Viscaria. However, Meller seems to be keen to increase the creepiness of his presentation by once again informing us of the things he does with his “harem” of “little lady lovelies”:

http://manboobz.com/2011/12/27/arky-may-ark-may-we-hardly-knew-ye-also-stinky-vaginas/comment-page-3/#comment-105850

One more case where you are absolutely wrong! Dolls, unlike feminists, and unlike even regular women, have whatever scent their man chooses them to have. I go to my nearest perfumery, buy a gift for my little lady lovely, apply discreetly, and…

she has the scent that I want her to have! That was easy, wasn’t it?

http://manboobz.com/2011/12/29/man-boobz-troll-and-trollhunter-of-the-year-awards-send-in-your-nominations/comment-page-6/#comment-106973

I don’t “douse my dolls in perfume”!

A small amount, suitable for a dainty and feminine little lady lovely, goes a LONG way!

Just because you modern women are ham-handed is no reason for youall to attribute such characteristics to me, or my little lady lovelies.

The important thing is that she has a delightfully feminine personality, dresses the way a woman should, and has a scent that one can appreciate.

http://manboobz.com/2011/12/29/man-boobz-troll-and-trollhunter-of-the-year-awards-send-in-your-nominations/comment-page-6/#comment-106993

I hate to disappoint you, but I am a very mild, quiet, easygoing (for the most part), largely solitary man who enjoys, among many other things, collecting a harem of fashion dolls. I am absolutely NOT a serial killer, or any other kind of killer, for that matter! My natural attitude toward living things is one of gentleness for those which I like, and a wish to avoid those I dislike. I would no more be capable of kidnapping, raping, or torturing women than I would be capable of sawing off my own right hand!

In all of my posts, I wish for a completely voluntary and willing female companion, NOT one whom I would have to force in any way. I already said, many times, that she is free to leave when she wants, and her pleasure is my pleasure. I haven’t been successful (yet) in finding the little lady lovely of my choice, where human females are concerned, but hope springs eternal!!

There is NOTHING sinister about me, in fact, even viewing such fare in cinema or on TV sometimes gives me nightmares.

I hope that this puts you at ease!

[Ahh, no, not at all, but thanks for trying David! That you are “absolutely NOT a serial killer” is of course completely reassuring. — Xanthe]

"The newest registered user is Mellerbarf"

I just thought y'all should know.

Catherine X - And here's some more details, now with EVEN MORE TMI AS IF IF THAT WERE EVEN POSSIBLE

they are “doused” (your word) with very nice, fragrant perfumes, dressed in lovely, really feminine, and beautiful clothes, (NOT “ridiculous” at all) that makes the most fashionable couture of today look like rags, and fondle, caress, and love them NOT in “disturbing” ways, but in ways guaranteed to give the bodies of women great pleasure and thrilling enjoyment!

NO! THAT'S not "Disturbing" at ALL!

Also, they totally show us who is the smarties-

They are in some ways much smarter than modern women; they know that they couldn’t feed, dress, or otherwise handle themselves without me, they love me, and for that reason, my dominance is assured!

Women don't like men at their businesses, schools, and taverns. Also, modern, progressive women have taverns.

And things take a turn for the even more horrifying:

Cats that scratch should be put to sleep.

If cats that scratch are put to sleep, that species will be eliminated quickly enough...

FINALLY! WHY WOMEN COLLECT DOLLS -

Zhinxi–January 13, 2012 @7:39pm:

I don’t know why women collect dolls (or plushfluffies)! I suspect that it is a fairly commonplace hobby for them when they see that they–and other women like them–have pretty much flopped hopelessly in the traditional role of women of bringing beauty and love into the world, that they are now, in far too many cases, imitation men, and they at least try to make up the shortfall of the feminine in the world caused by their pseudo-masculinity and androgyny by cultivating the collection and display of beautiful images, photographs, figurines, and dainty feminine dolls, preferably highlighting an era when ladylike daintiness, softness, and allure, even when it wasn’t especially sexual, was valued and cherished.

The thought of a man doing this reminds them of their betrayal of the feminine in their own lives, even if they do live their lives as traditional women, and this is why they call MY doll collecting “creepy”.

.............................



Not because you pour perfume on them, call them your harem, or tell us you wank to them. Not at ALL...

Also, even traditional women who collect dolls, we see, are betraying the feminine.

Nobody says him collecting dolls is creepy.. they think that he wants to replace real women with dolls to have sex with as being creepy. xD

Women

For every woman studying math or science, there are up to 20 equally or more-talented men. It is estimated that there are only seven women alive who have graduated at the top of post-doctoral mathematics programs.

Government

Government is the sole source of discrimination. If government were abolished, all businesses would become meritocracies, objectively evaluating and hiring the most talented applicant for a job.

objectively evaluating and hiring the most talented applicant for a job.

Addendum - Race and Gender would be utterly irrelevant to this merit.

Except when discrimination on the basis of race and gender is totally rational.

Which is always...

"–because discrimination on the basis of past results of many people over a long period of time is RATIONAL, whereas reverse discrimination (preferring the less able over the more so) is NOT!"

Stop creep shaming this poor man!

If wanting women to be replaced by fluffy sex dolls is creepy, I ... wait, what?

I guess that is sort of creepy.

Man oh man, I really need to update this with all the new shit. Except the level of racism is making me feel kinda ill. : /

*bump*

It’s been a while since this thread’s been updated, especially as there’s been a rise in non-flesh-covered posters to the blog, but this latest outrage by the 17th century vampire we know and love(?) as David K. Meller simply cannot go undocumented here:

http://manboobz.com/2012/04/10/mens-rights-redditors-find-ebonics-hilarious/comment-page-3/#comment-144808

What “racism”?

It wasn’t Men’s rightsers who concocted “ebonics”; the preposterous, semi-obscene, illiterate display of black ghettospeak which unfortunately passes for Black “English” in far too many circles.

It wasn’t even American Rennaisance, Stormfront, or National Alliance!

It was people who demanded that real standards of scholarship and literature were “elitist”, that it was somehow “unfair” to expect black people to read, write, and speak like white people, and that White speech (and manners) were somehow a “racist” imposition on blacks.

You are what you show yourselves to be, whether as egalitarian liberal white(?) morons, or black savages…

I’ll take Spearhead, in Mala Fide, and Anti-Feminist Tech, etc. any time! If it makes you feel better, I think that even Stormfront or American Renaissance have an edge on you “ebonics” advocates there! If support for or apology for “ebonix” is support for equality, I’ll take elitism any time.

Followed a post or two later by some frankly almost unbelievable genocide advocacy (but this is Meller, after all):

Of course, sterilizing sluts, tramps, and other candidates for unwed motherhood–an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure–would solve the problem of “deadbeat dads” permanently, wouldn’t it? So would mandatory adoption of children of such women…

Food for thought!

Fucking disgusting racism and eugenics. It’s like the 20th century didn’t happen in Mellertron’s world.

Catherine X wrote:
Fucking disgusting racism and eugenics. It’s like the 20th century didn’t happen in Mellertron’s world.

Yeah, this is basically why I quit updating it. Meller's so fucking earnest it made me ill. : /

A possible friend for DKM?

A convicted felon and alleged member of the Aryan Brotherhood accused of beating a 12-year-old boy now faces federal firearms charges.

Federal prosecutors in Tacoma contend police found shotgun and handgun ammunition amongst James T. Sapp’s doll collection while searching his house after allegations that he choked a boy who approached him after Sapp’s dogs killed his chickens.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/FBI-Racist-doll-collector-beat-child-caught-3495929.php

Hell, maybe it is Meller. We haven't heard from him lately, have we?

David Futrelle wrote:A possible friend for DKM?

A convicted felon and alleged member of the Aryan Brotherhood accused of beating a 12-year-old boy now faces federal firearms charges.

Federal prosecutors in Tacoma contend police found shotgun and handgun ammunition amongst James T. Sapp’s doll collection while searching his house after allegations that he choked a boy who approached him after Sapp’s dogs killed his chickens.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/FBI-Racist-doll-collector-beat-child-caught-3495929.php

I don't even know how to comment on this. XD

Shaenon, nah, he's posted a couple of comments recently. And he's on the other side of the continent. Maybe they're in the same internet racist doll club. Or maybe DKM needs to start one.

AryanLadyLovelies.com is still available.